C-Band Spectrum: 5G Delivering the Next Level of Experience

2022-08-11
关注

Industry analysts, players and authorities — including GSMA and Ericsson — have been heralding the mobile broadband (MBB) data traffic growth that will likely happen over the next 10-15 years. Meanwhile, 4G Long-Term Evolution (LTE) is positioned to remain the dominant mobile access technology while commercial scale 5G deployments continue to roll out. 

LTE has improved spectral efficiency since its introduction in the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Release (Rel) 8. Waveforms, modulation advancements, coding schemes (e.g., 64-QAM/256-QAM) and multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) antennas have pushed the download data speed limits over the gigabit mark. Then, they were pushed into the multiple gigabit range with 3GPP Rel 15, the first phase of 5G deployments. 

Not all the news about LTE or 5G and MBB is rosy. Devices in noisy environments dampen the efficiency of technological improvements by reducing data rate and capacity. Achieving a higher MIMO order is still a challenge for device manufacturers hosting multiple antennas in a limited space. Densifying the networks and intensifying the distribution of small cells can help. However, this deployment process presents effort and money challenges for mobile network operators (MNOs). 

Carrier Aggregation Drives Up MBB Demand

So far, carrier aggregation (CA) has been a successful option for overcoming MBB deployment obstacles. The more combined carriers, the more expansive the usable spectrum and the higher the data speed. 

Therefore, MNOs can better support the increasing demand for traffic growth while limiting superfluous infrastructure investments. However, they still need to acquire additional spectrum.

What Is the C-Band Spectrum?

Allocating new spectrum has become a mandatory requirement for the mobile industry to improve capacity and enhance mobile broadband (eMBB). 5G technology accommodated the use of millimeter wave (mmWave) spectrum between 24 GHz and 29.5 GHz. 

However, due to its wavelength, propagation at these high frequencies is complex and often requires line-of-sight (LOS) conditions between the base station and device. These conditions require highly directional beams and massive MIMO antennas that track users in real time. 

The sub-6 GHz domain contributes a critical portion of the spectrum on the lower bands. It offers a compromise between the broad coverage of lower frequencies and the higher capacity of mmWave. Part of this spectrum is known as C-band. C-band sits between 3.4 GHz and 4.2 GHz and has emerged as a prime resource for the capacity crunch. There was much controversy at the start of its use with the debate on whether C-band 5G cell towers might interfere with commercial airline operations. The FAA and MNOs have agreed on “exclusion zones” where specific C-band frequencies are not deployed near airports. 

What Are the Benefits of C-Band Spectrum? 

The benefit of C-band, compared to mmWave, can be assessed from two different viewpoints: 

  • Economic: Overlay the C-band on existing macrocellular or small-cell grids without needing new cell sites, unlike mmWave. 
  • Technical: Access to a spectrum range with fewer challenging propagation conditions than mmWave. This approach reinforces transmission in a non-line-of-sight (NLOS) environment and facilitates indoor penetration on a scale like lower-frequency bands. 

C-band spectrum also provides a few advantages over lower frequencies based on frequency-division-duplex (FDD-LTE) technology. C-band is a time-division-duplex technology (TDD-LTE). Even though TDD throughput per megahertz of spectrum is lower than FDD, the carrier bandwidth in TDD can be up to 100 MHz in sub-6 GHz 5G operations (versus 20 MHz in LTE). It also allows transmission and reception on the same channel, compared to FDD-LTE requirements for a paired spectrum with different frequencies and a guard band. For a TDD-LTE device, this capability eliminates using a dedicated diplexer to isolate transmission and receptions, which reduces the bill of materials (BOM) cost.  

Since they are part of the same 3GPP standards, FDD-LTE and TDD-LTE offer comparable performances and similar high-spectral efficiency. There is increasing industry interest in applying this technology to MBB. 

Although the most used TDD spectrum is Band 40, Bands 42 and 43 are gaining attention, especially across Europe and Asia-Pacific. These two C-bands are licensed globally for commercial terrestrial cellular deployment. Moreover, it allocates a potential spectrum of as much as 400 MHz between 3.4 GHz and 3.8 GHz. This spectrum generates frequency to support applications that require high data throughput (e.g., smartphones and industrial and home gateways). 

In the U.S. market, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) allocated a similar spectrum in Band 48. This band has a range of 150 MHz from 3.55 GHz to 3.7 GHz to create the Citizens Broadband Radio System (CBRS). Three primary user tiers share access: incumbent, priority access license (PAL) and general authorized access (GAA). These levels create demand for operators looking to:  

  • Enter the mobile wireless market  
  • Facilitate a private LTE network for large enterprises  
  • Expand capacity cost-effectively 

C-Band: A Steppingstone for 5G

As an active MBB ecosystem player, Telit continues collaborating technology, products and solutions in response to the increasing demand for more 5G mid-band support. We also deliver higher cost and production efficiencies for MBB devices. C-band range centered around 3.5 GHz can aid 5G by providing the NLOS spectrum industry players need. As the most cost-effective expansion spectrum for 5G, it is only natural that it would quickly become its most popular band globally. About 75% of MNOs set one of the three C-bands (i.e., n77, n78 and n79) as their primary 5G band.  

Are you ready to find out what C-band can do for your next MBB device? See how easy it is to get started with Telit’s 5G sample kit.  


Editor’s Note: This post was first published on 16 January 2019 and has since been updated. 

参考译文
c波段频谱:5G交付下一阶段体验
包括 GSMA 和 Ericsson 在内的行业分析师、玩家和权威人士一直在预测,移动宽带(MBB) 的数据流量可能会在未来10-15年出现增长。与此同时,4G长期演进(LTE)的定位仍然是占主导地位的移动接入技术,而商业规模 5G 部署继续推出。LTE自 第三代合作伙伴计划(3GPP) 发布版(Rel) 8引入以来,已经提高了频谱效率。波形、调制技术的进步、编码方案(如64-QAM/256-QAM)和多输入多输出(MIMO)天线已经将下载数据的速度限制推到了千兆位上。然后,他们被推进到多个千兆范围的3GPP Rel 15, 5G部署的第一阶段。并非所有关于LTE、5G和MBB的消息都是乐观的。噪声环境中的设备会降低数据速率和容量,从而降低技术改进的效率。实现更高的MIMO订单仍然是一个挑战,设备制造商托管多个天线在有限的空间。致密化网络和强化小细胞的分布会有所帮助。然而,这一部署过程给移动网络运营商(MNOs)带来了精力和资金上的挑战。到目前为止,运营商聚合(CA)已经成为克服MBB部署障碍的一个成功选择。组合载波越多,可用频谱越广,数据传输速度越快。因此,跨国公司可以更好地支持日益增长的流量增长需求,同时限制多余的基础设施投资。然而,他们仍然需要获得额外的频谱。分配新频谱已成为移动通信行业提高通信容量和增强移动宽带(eMBB)的一项强制性要求。5G技术适用于24 GHz到29.5 GHz之间的毫米波(mmWave)频谱。然而,由于其波长,在这些高频率的传播是复杂的,经常需要在基站和设备之间的视线(LOS)条件。这些条件需要高定向波束和大规模的MIMO天线,实时跟踪用户。子6 GHz域在较低频段贡献了频谱的关键部分。它提供了较低频率的广泛覆盖和更高容量毫米波之间的折衷。这个光谱的一部分被称为c波段。c频段位于3.4 - 4.2 GHz之间,已经成为解决容量危机的主要资源。刚开始使用时,人们对c波段5G基站是否会干扰商业航空公司的运营存在很大争议。FAA和MNOs已经就“禁区”达成一致,即不将特定的c波段频率部署在机场附近。与mmWave相比,c波段频谱的优势可以从两个不同的角度来评估:c波段频谱与基于频分双工(FDD-LTE)技术的较低频率相比也有一些优势。c频段是一种时分双工技术(TDD-LTE)。尽管TDD每兆赫频谱的吞吐量低于FDD,但在低于6兆赫的5G操作中,TDD的载波带宽可达100兆赫(而LTE为20兆赫)。与FDD-LTE对不同频率和保护频带的配对频谱的要求相比,它还允许在同一个信道上传输和接收。对于TDD-LTE设备,该功能无需使用专用双工器来隔离传输和接收,从而降低了物料清单(BOM)成本。由于它们属于同一个3GPP标准,FDD-LTE和TDD-LTE提供了可比较的性能和类似的高频谱效率。对于将该技术应用于MBB,越来越多的行业人士表示了兴趣 。 虽然最常用的TDD频谱是波段40,但波段42和43也越来越受关注,尤其是在欧洲和亚太地区。这两个c波段已获得全球商用陆地蜂窝部署许可。此外,它在3.4 - 3.8 GHz之间分配了高达400 MHz的潜在频谱。该频谱产生的频率支持需要高数据吞吐量的应用程序(例如,智能手机和工业和家庭网关)。在美国市场, 联邦通信委员会(FCC) 分配了类似的频段48。该频段的范围为150 MHz,从3.55 GHz到3.7 GHz,用于创建公民宽带无线电系统(CBRS)。三个主要用户层共享访问:在位用户、优先访问许可(PAL)和一般授权访问(GAA)。作为一个活跃的MBB生态系统参与者,Telit继续合作技术、产品和解决方案,以响应对更多5G中频段支持的日益增长的需求。我们还为MBB设备提供更高的成本和生产效率。以3.5 GHz为中心的c波段范围可以通过提供行业玩家所需的NLOS频谱来帮助5G。作为5G最具成本效益的扩展频段,它很快就会成为全球最受欢迎的频段。大约75%的MNOs将三个c波段(即n77、n78和n79)中的一个作为其主要的5G波段。你准备好为你的下一个MBB设备做些什么了吗?看看开始使用Telit的 5G样本包是多么容易。编者注:本文首次发布于2019年1月16日,此后进行了更新。
  • 5G
  • 通信
  • 运营商
  • 5g通信
  • 频谱效率
  • en
  • c波段
  • fdd-lte
您觉得本篇内容如何
评分

评论

您需要登录才可以回复|注册

提交评论

提取码
复制提取码
点击跳转至百度网盘