Bacterial ‘Nanosyringe’ Could Deliver Gene Therapy to Human Cells

2023-03-28 23:51:17
关注

Inside the gut of a caterpillar lives a worm, and inside the worm lurks a bioluminescent bacterium named Photorhabdus asymbiotica, which makes the caterpillar glow in the dark. But this nesting-doll-like setup has another, more harmful effect: the bacteria secrete a deadly molecular syringe, 100 nanometers long, that latches onto the insect’s cells. Once attached to a cell, the syringe pushes a molecular spear through the cell’s membrane that releases a toxic payload. As its insect host dies and decomposes, the bacteria escape to colonize their next victim.

In a paper published today in Nature, researchers report refashioning Photorhabdus’s syringe—called a contractile injection system—so that it can attach to human cells and inject large proteins into them. The work could provide a way to deliver various therapeutic proteins into any type of cell, including proteins that can “edit” the cell’s DNA. “It’s a very interesting approach,” says Mark Kay, a gene therapy researcher at Stanford University who was not involved in the study. “Where I think it could be very useful is when you want to express proteins that can do genome editing” to correct or knock out a gene that is mutated in a genetic disorder, he says.

The nano injector could provide a critical tool for scientists interested in tweaking genes. “Delivery is probably the biggest unsolved problem for gene editing,” says study investigator Feng Zhang, a molecular biologist at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Broad Institute of M.I.T. and Harvard. Zhang is known for his work developing the gene editing system CRISPR-Cas9. Existing technology can insert the editing machinery “into a few tissues, blood and liver and the eye, but we don’t have a good way to get to anywhere else,” such as the brain, heart, lung or kidney, Zhang says. The syringe technology also holds promise for treating cancer because it can be engineered to attach to receptors on certain cancer cells.

Zhang had been looking for new ways to deliver gene-editing enzymes to cells when, two years ago, he and his graduate student Joseph Kreitz read two papers on Photorhabdus’s injection system. The system was unique because it was adapted to insect cells. “This is one of the very rare examples where a bacterial thing injects into an animal cell,” as opposed to into another bacterial cell, Zhang says. “We thought if this could inject into an animal cell, maybe it could work on human cells.”

The researchers mass-produced the miniature injectors by inserting genetic blueprints for the injectors into Escherichia coli bacteria. The E. coli dutifully secreted the tiny syringes, which, when exposed to insect cells, bound to them and injected their toxins as expected. But when Kreitz and Zhang tested these injectors on human cells, they failed to work. “So then we had to figure out: How do we engineer this thing?” Zhang says.

Zhang’s team homed in on tentaclelike structures on the injectors called tail fibers, which grab and hold onto cells before the injector pierces cells’ membranes. The researchers tweaked these fibers in more than 100 different ways to try to get them to latch on to human cells. Nothing worked. Then, about a year into the project, a newly released version of artificial intelligence software called AlphaFold came to their rescue. AlphaFold predicts the three-dimensional structure of proteins from sequences of amino acids. A 3-D view of a tail fiber protein helped the team figure out how to alter it so that it would reliably attach to human cells.

In one experiment, the team was able to make the nanosyringes with altered tail fibers stick to an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that sits on the surface of some human cancer cells. Loading the injection system with a toxin killed nearly all the cells bearing the receptor but did not harm other cells, illustrating its specificity. The researchers tailored the injectors’ tail fibers to recognize surface markers on other cell types as well.

Zhang’s team also found it could pack the system with various protein payloads by adding a tag to the proteins that marks them as ammunition that needs to be loaded onto a syringe’s needle. The scientists attached this tag to protein toxins and the gene-editing enzyme Cas9, a large molecular scissors that snips DNA at a location specified by a molecule that guides the scissors to the right place. When these proteins were delivered to human cells, they either killed the cells or edited the cells’ genes. “We show that just by putting a tag onto the protein, we can load different types of proteins into these needles,” Zhang says. Each needle also can load multiple copies of a proteins to increase dosage, Zhang says.

To further explore the technology, the researchers again used AlphaFold to engineer these tiny syringes to bind to mouse cells and injected them into the brain of a mouse, where they inserted a protein into neurons that made the cells glow. “Being able to do it intracranially in mice and seeing some delivery of an actual payload in actual neurons—that’s amazing and impressive,” says Rodolphe Barrangou, a geneticist at North Carolina State University who studies CRISPR-Cas but was not involved in the new study.

It is still very early days for the technology, however. Zhang plans to build on its efficiency as a delivery device as well as to experiment with nonprotein payloads such as DNA and RNA. Down the road, it will be important to test the technology in “higher mammals,” Kay says. “There are a lot of things that work well in mice or smaller mammals that don’t end up working as well in nonhuman primates or humans,” he adds. And because the injection systems consist of bacterial proteins, they could also lead to immune reactions in humans. “We need to know: How immunogenic is it if we put it into humans?” Zhang says.

Still, the work showcases the importance of biological inspiration for solving difficult technical problems in biology and medicine, Barrangou says. “This is a very good example of that focus on unearthing from natural biological dark matter items of interest that have practical use and that are good enough to be deployable,” he says.

参考译文
细菌“纳米注射器”可以为人类细胞提供基因治疗
在毛毛虫的肠道里寄居着一条线虫,而在这条线虫体内还潜伏着一种名为共生发光菌(Photorhabdus asymbiotica)的生物发光细菌,它能使毛毛虫在黑暗中发光。但这种像嵌套娃娃般的结构还有另一个更致命的效果:这些细菌会分泌一种长达100纳米的致命分子注射器,它能附着在昆虫的细胞上。一旦附着到细胞上,注射器便能穿透细胞膜,将有毒的毒素释放到细胞内部。随着昆虫宿主的死亡和分解,细菌会逃逸出来,去感染下一个宿主。今天发表在《自然》(Nature)期刊上的一篇论文中,研究人员报告称,他们已对这种共生发光菌的注射器——被称为收缩注射系统——进行了改造,使其能够附着到人类细胞上,并将大分子蛋白质注入其中。这项研究可能提供一种方法,将各种治疗性蛋白质送入任何类型的细胞,包括能“编辑”细胞DNA的蛋白质。“这方法非常有趣。”斯坦福大学的基因治疗研究员马克·凯(Mark Kay)表示,他并未参与这项研究。“我认为它在你想表达基因编辑蛋白时非常有用,”他说,“比如用来修正或敲除在遗传疾病中发生突变的基因。”这种纳米注射器可能为研究人员调整基因提供一种关键工具。“递送可能是基因编辑面临的最大未解难题。”麻省理工学院麦戈文脑科学研究所和哈佛大学与麻省理工学院合作的博德研究所的分子生物学家张锋(Feng Zhang)说,他因开发基因编辑系统CRISPR-Cas9而闻名。现有的技术可以将编辑工具“送入几种组织,比如血液、肝脏和眼睛,”张锋表示,“但我们还没有办法将其送入其他部位,比如大脑、心脏、肺或肾脏。”这种注射器技术也可能在治疗癌症方面具有前景,因为它可以被设计用于附着于某些癌细胞上的受体。两年前,张锋和他的研究生约瑟夫·克赖茨(Joseph Kreitz)阅读了两篇关于共生发光菌注射系统的论文,当时他正在寻找将基因编辑酶递送到细胞的新方法。该系统独特之处在于它适应了昆虫细胞。“这是极少数细菌注射到动物细胞中的例子之一,而非其他细菌细胞中。”张锋说,“我们想,如果它能注射进动物细胞,也许也能用于人类细胞。”研究人员通过将注射器的基因蓝图插入大肠杆菌(E. coli)中,大量生产了这些微型注射器。这些大肠杆菌忠实地释放出这些微小的注射器,当它们接触到昆虫细胞时,正如预期的那样,会附着在细胞上并注射毒素。但当克赖茨和张锋将这些注射器测试在人类细胞上时,它们却毫无作用。“所以我们开始思考:我们该怎么改造这种结构?”张锋说。张锋的团队将注意力集中在注射器上类似触手的结构上,这些结构被称为尾纤维,它们在注射器刺穿细胞膜之前抓住并附着细胞。研究人员尝试了100多种方法来改造这些尾纤维,以使其能附着在人类细胞上,但都未成功。大约一年后,一款新发布的名为AlphaFold的人工智能软件挽救了他们。AlphaFold可以根据氨基酸序列预测蛋白质的三维结构。尾纤维蛋白的3D结构帮助团队弄清楚如何修改它,使其能稳定地附着在人类细胞上。在一项实验中,团队成功使经过改造的尾纤维纳米注射器附着在某些人类癌细胞表面的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)上。当将毒素装载到这个注射系统中时,能杀死几乎所有携带该受体的细胞,而对其他细胞则无害,这展示了其高度特异性。研究人员还对这些注射器的尾纤维进行了改良,使其能识别其他类型细胞的表面标记。张锋的团队还发现,他们可以通过在蛋白质上添加一个标签,将各种蛋白质有效载荷装载到系统中,这个标签标记了这些蛋白质为需要装载到注射器针头上的“弹药”。科学家们将这个标签附加到蛋白质毒素和基因编辑酶Cas9上,这是一种大型的分子剪刀,能够按照引导分子的指示在指定位置切割DNA。当这些蛋白质被递送至人类细胞后,它们要么杀死这些细胞,要么编辑了这些细胞的基因。“我们展示的是,只需在蛋白质上添加一个标签,就可以将不同类型的蛋白质装入这些针头中,”张锋说。每个针头还能装载多个蛋白质的拷贝以增加剂量,他说。为了进一步探索这项技术,研究人员再次利用AlphaFold设计了这些微小的注射器,使其能够结合小鼠细胞,并将它们注入小鼠大脑中,成功地将一种蛋白质注入神经元细胞,使这些细胞发光。“能够在小鼠脑内进行实际的注射,并看到实际的蛋白质有效载荷被递送到实际的神经元中,这是惊人的,令人印象深刻。”北卡罗来纳州立大学的遗传学家罗多尔夫·巴朗戈(Rodolphe Barrangou)说,他研究CRISPR-Cas,但并未参与这项新研究。然而,这项技术仍处于非常初级的阶段。张锋计划提高其作为递送设备的效率,并尝试非蛋白质类载荷,例如DNA和RNA。在未来,对“高等哺乳动物”进行测试也将是关键,凯说。“有很多技术在小鼠或小型哺乳动物中表现良好,但最终在非人灵长类或人类中效果却并不理想。”他还补充说。此外,由于这些注射系统由细菌蛋白组成,它们也可能引发人体的免疫反应。“我们需要知道:如果我们将其注入人体,免疫反应会有多强?”张锋说。尽管如此,这项工作展示了自然界的生物启发在解决生物学和医学中的难题方面的重要性,巴朗戈表示。“这是这个方向上的一个极好例子,展现了我们从自然生物黑暗物质中挖掘具有实用价值且可部署的宝贵资源的潜力。”他说。
您觉得本篇内容如何
评分

评论

您需要登录才可以回复|注册

提交评论

广告
提取码
复制提取码
点击跳转至百度网盘